Abstract

Over the past 16 years, more than half (59.68%) of research papers in China on DNA barcoding have been published in Chinese rather than English. Using the records in BOLD (Barcode of Life Data) system, we found Chinese scientists have contributed nearly 120 thousand DNA barcodes for more than 16 thousand species as of September, 2019, with barcoded species distributed throughout China. Based on 2,624 articles and 494 dissertations published during the last 16 years, we reviewed the basic statistics of these studies, including the type of articles contributed by Chinese scientists, the preference of taxonomic groups, the characteristic of barcoding studies in China, the current limitations, and potential future directions as well. We found that most barcode data pertain primarily to plants and animals. Most work in China has focused on verification of the authenticity of species used in traditional Chinese medicine, while other applications paid more attention to food safety, inspection and quarantine, and control of pests and invasive species. In methodology and technology, a number of new DNA barcoding methods were developed by Chinese scientists. However, there are several severe limitations of research on DNA barcoding in China in general, such as the lack of leadership in pioneering international projects, the absence of an open bioinformatics infrastructure, and the fact that some Chinese journals do not clearly require data transparency and availability for DNA barcodes, impeding the further development of barcode libraries and research in China. In the future, Chinese scientists should build authoritative online libraries, while aiming for theoretical innovations for both concepts and methodology of DNA barcoding.

Highlights

  • Since the inception of DNA barcoding in 2003 (Hebert et al, 2003a,b), it has become widely used as a taxonomic tool (DeSalle and Goldstein, 2019)

  • Based on the barcode combinations recommended by the Consortium for Barcode of Life (CBOL), they proposed that ITS/ITS2 should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants after conducting a large number of tests on four DNA barcode candidate fragments of 6,286 specimens (China-Plant-BOL-Group et al, 2011)

  • All 2,624 articles were classified into four categories: Category 1 – basic studies, where one or more DNA barcodes are established for specific taxonomic groups; Category 2 – practical studies, where DNA barcodes are used to identify species or other ecologically related research; Category 3 – methodological studies, where new algorithms or methods of species identification are developed, computer programs are established, or comparisons are made between different DNA barcoding approaches; and Category 4 – reviews that summarize recent advances in DNA barcoding, including those focusing on certain groups of taxa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the inception of DNA barcoding in 2003 (Hebert et al, 2003a,b), it has become widely used as a taxonomic tool (DeSalle and Goldstein, 2019). We systematically searched for articles published by Chinese scientists in both domestic and international journals from 2003 to August 2019 and summarized the contributions of Chinese scientists in DNA barcoding research in terms of their publications and data outputs.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.