Abstract

A crucial part of dynamic motions is the interaction with other objects or the environment. Floating base robots have yet to perform these motions repeatably and reliably. Force torque sensors are able to provide the full description of a contact. Despite that, their use beyond a simple threshold logic is not widespread in floating base robots. Force torque sensors might change performance when mounted, which is why in situ calibration methods can improve the performance of robots by ensuring better force torque measurements. The Model-Based in situ calibration method with temperature compensation has shown promising results in improving FT sensor measurements. There are two main goals for this paper. The first is to facilitate the use and understanding of the method by providing guidelines that show their usefulness through experimental results. Then the impact of having better FT measurements with no temperature drift are demonstrated by proving that the offset estimated with this method is still useful days and even a month from the time of estimation. The effect of this is showcased by comparing the sensor response with different offsets simultaneously during real robot experiments. Furthermore, quantitative results of the improvement in dynamic behaviors due to the in situ calibration are shown. Finally, we show how using better FT measurements as feedback in low and high level controllers can impact the performance of floating base robots during dynamic motions. Experiments were performed on the floating base robot iCub.

Highlights

  • Robots are expected to perform highly dynamical motions

  • The developed in situ calibration method is described in detail

  • The value can not be compared among datasets, the tendencies are similar

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Robots are expected to perform highly dynamical motions. Knowledge of the forces exchanged at contacts is a fundamental part of endowing robots with the ability to perform dynamical motions. It is the relationship between the deformation of a spring and forces, it is the Hooke’s law of elasticity. Where f is the force value in N, k is a constant of the material N m−1 and ∆x is the displacement (or strain) in meter It is valid as long as the material does not reach plastic deformation. Another definition of Hooke’s Law is the relationship between engineering stress and engineering strain for elastic deformation [32].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call