Situational influences on response time and maneuver choice: Development of time-critical scenarios

Abstract

Findings concerning drivers’ response times to sudden events vary considerably across studies due to different experimental setups and situational characteristics, such as expectancy of an event and urgency to react. While response times are widely reported in the literature, understanding of drivers’ choice of maneuvers in time-critical situations is limited. Standardized test scenarios could enhance the comparability of studies and help in attaining a better understanding of driver behavior in these situations.In an effort to achieve these improvements, three driving simulator studies (N = 131) were conducted to investigate drivers’ response time and maneuver choice under a range of situational conditions. Each study took place in a specific environmental setting (urban, rural, and highway) and incorporated one unexpected and 12 subsequent events (increased expectancy). Four different time-critical scenarios were used to evoke different driver responses. In three scenarios, obstacles suddenly entered the roadway (braking, steering, or both possible). A fourth scenario comprised the sudden braking of a leading vehicle (only braking possible). Half of the drivers performed a cognitive secondary task. To validate the findings, results from an additional field test (N = 14) were compared to the results from the simulated urban environment.As expected, response choice was influenced by scenario characteristics (available braking distance and room for evasive maneuvers). Braking maneuvers were more frequent in settings with lower speed limits (urban) while steering maneuvers were found at higher speed limits (highway). Responses to suddenly appearing obstacles were fastest in the urban setting at 540–680 ms; these responses were 200–300 ms slower in the rural and highway settings. Response times increased by 100–200 ms when drivers responded to braking leading vehicles rather than obstacles. Braking responses were 200–350 ms slower and steering responses were 90–200 ms slower when drivers responded to an unexpected event rather than subsequent events. The cognitive secondary task had no significant effect. The simulated environment and the field test produced comparable response behavior.The current study provides reference numbers that help to establish a set of standardized test scenarios for future studies. On basis of this study, nine scenarios are recommended for the context of time-critical crash avoidance maneuvers. Such standardized test scenarios could improve the comparability of future studies on response time and maneuver choice.