Abstract

This study reviews the current information concerning the measurement of the situation awareness (SA) of the teleoperated drivers of remotely controlled cars. The teleoperated drivers who drive these cars are in a remote location, and they control the cars through a communication interface. The objective methods with probes are beneficial in measuring SA on a closed circuit without real traffic. Questions specifically should address the information provided on the road by haptic sensations, such as the slope of the road and the vehicle's speed. Methods for measuring SA that involve probes and interruptions obviously are not suitable for use on public roads. A stable environment for the display and control of the communication interface is suitable for an eye tracker in measuring SA. These features also facilitate the use of subjective observer-rating methods. Both of these methods are suitable for driving on real roads because they are not intrusive. SA research in a real-road environment also should demonstrate how the SA of other drivers is affected by seeing a car without a driver. Given the remote character of driving, cultural differences in cognition may have a significant influence on the SA of the teleoperated driver.

Highlights

  • Technological development allows for the operation of vehicles without a driver in the vehicle

  • We provide directions concerning how to measure the situational awareness (SA) of the Remotely controlled cars (RCCs)’ teleoperated drivers to assess their driving skills

  • The rest of the paper is organized as follows: We review the concept of SA and its measurement

Read more

Summary

Situation Awareness Measurement in Remotely Controlled Cars

Specialty section: This article was submitted to Performance Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology. This study reviews the current information concerning the measurement of the situation awareness (SA) of the teleoperated drivers of remotely controlled cars. The teleoperated drivers who drive these cars are in a remote location, and they control the cars through a communication interface. Methods for measuring SA that involve probes and interruptions obviously are not suitable for use on public roads. A stable environment for the display and control of the communication interface is suitable for an eye tracker in measuring SA. These features facilitate the use of subjective observer-rating methods. Both of these methods are suitable for driving on real roads because they are not intrusive.

INTRODUCTION
SITUATION AWARENESS AND ITS MEASUREMENT
Availability of taking control during operation
SITUATION AWARENESS IN REMOTELY CONTROLLED VEHICLES
Sensations of the vestibular organs
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call