Site-occupancy models may offer new opportunities for dragonfly monitoring based on daily species lists

Abstract

Abstract Monitoring biodiversity is necessary but difficult to achieve in practice, in part because standardized field work is often demanding for volunteer field workers. Collecting opportunistic data on presence and absence of species is much less demanding, but such data may suffer from a number of biases, such as variation in observation effort over time. Here we explore whether site-occupancy models may be helpful to reduce such biases in opportunistic data, especially those caused by temporal variation of observation effort and by incomplete reporting of sightings. Site-occupancy models represent a generalisation of classical metapopulation models to account for imperfect detection; they estimate the probability of sites to be occupied (and of the rates of change, colonisation and extinction rates) while taking into account imperfect detection of a species. The models require so-called presence–absence data from replicated visits for a number of sites (e.g., 20–50). We tested whether these models provide reliable trend estimates if collectors of opportunistic data do not report all species detected. We applied the models to three opportunistic datasets of dragonfly species (1999–2007) in the Netherlands: (1) one-species records, (2) short daily species lists and (3) comprehensive daily species lists. Trend estimates based on a fourth dataset from a standardized monitoring scheme were used as a yardstick to judge the results. The analyses showed that occupancy trends based on comprehensive daily species lists in combination with site-occupancy models were generally similar to those based on the monitoring scheme. But trends based on one-species records and short daily lists were too imprecise to be very useful. In addition, site-occupancy models lead to more realistic occupancy estimates than those obtained from conventional logistic regression analysis. We conclude that comprehensive daily species lists can be useful surrogates for monitoring schemes to assess distributional trends.