Abstract
To improve the accuracy of the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) gross primary production (GPP) algorithm, it is critical to evaluate MODIS GPP production for different land cover types using ground-based measurements. In this paper the MODIS primary production products (MOD17) is evaluated by using site-specific input parameters to the algorithm and compared to the results of eddy covariance measurements over an old-growth forest. Direct comparisons suggest that 8-day GPP predicted by the standard MODIS algorithm was highly correlated with flux tower based GPP (r2 = 0.77, P<0.001), while with an average underestimation of 39%. The difference is substantial in magnitude mainly because the inputs of underestimated MODIS biome-specific parameters, maximum light use efficiency emax and MODIS derived fraction of photosynthetically active radiation. The modified MODIS algorithm GPP calculated with site-specific input parameters compares favorably with ground flux tower observations (r2 = 0.92, relative error = 7%). These results suggest that the MODIS GPP production is most likely underpredicted in forest sites with high primary production, and site-specific input parameters could help to improve the accuracy of MODIS GPP algorithm.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
