Abstract
Introduction: Nasal polyposis (NP) is a chronic inflammatory disease involvingmucous membrane in paranasal sinuses and nose. It presents as gelatinous, semitranslucent,smooth, pedunculated pear or round shaped masses comprising of inflamed mucosa thatout-pouches into nose. The available surgical options are Functional Endoscopic SinusSurgery (FESS) and Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy (CIP). The study aims to compareFESS and CIP in sinonasal polyposis patient in term of symptomatic improvement. StudyDesign: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of head n’ neck surgery andOtorhinolaryngology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad. Period: 01-01-2015 to20-08-2015. Methodology: A total of 84 patients presenting with nasal polyposis were enrolled.Out of these 84 patients, 42 patients were randomly selected for FESS (Group-A). Rest of the42 patients were selected for CIP (Group-B). All the information recorded on the Performawas entered and analysed using SPSS version 17. The entire study duration was 31 weeks.Regarding ethical consideration, the study was approved from ethics committee of hospital.Informed consent was obtained from the study participants. Moreover, confidentiality andanonymity of subjects was assured. The patients were followed-up for 2 months duration. Theentire study duration was about 8 months. Results: On the basis of scoring of nasal obstruction,in FESS Group-A, 32 (76.19%) patients had completely patent nose after two months and only10 (23.81%) patients had partially blocked nose. On the other hand in CIP Group-B, only 16(38.10%) patients had completely patent nose while 26 (60.90%) patients had partially blockednose after two months. The comparison of sense of smell between both groups also showedthat the outcome of Group-A was significantly (p-value = 0.000) better as compared to Group-B.The complete sense of smell was found present in 37 (88.10%) patients in group A in contrastwith 19 (45.23%) patients in group B. Conclusion: FESS seems to be a better treatment optionfor sinonasal polyposis than conventional intranasal polypectomy. However study with largerpopulation size and longer follow up duration is recommended to rationalize the results.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
