Abstract
This article asks why the deuteronomic law, like the Book of the Covenant, differs from ancient Near Eastern law codes in adopting the second person singular form of address. It also considers the relationship between the deuteronomic code and ancient Near Eastern treaties, especially the Vassal Treaties of Esarhaddon (VTE), where the singular address is used. Accepting a formal similarity between the deuteronomic code and VTE, it is argued that Deuteronomy adapts the use of the singular address in laws to support its theology of the responsibility of the people as such for the keeping of the Torah. This is in contrast to the idea of the king as sovereign, especially in relation to administration of law, which, it is argued, Deuteronomy opposes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
