Single-session high intensity focussed ablation (HIFU) versus open cervical hemithyroidectomy for benign thyroid nodule: analysis on early efficacy, safety and voice quality

Abstract

Background: High intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) is a promising non-surgical treatment for symptomatic benign thyroid nodule. We aimed to compare early efficacy, safety and voice quality between HIFU ablation and open thyroidectomy.Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent single-session HIFU ablation or a hemithyroidectomy for symptomatic benign thyroid nodule were included. The 6-month extent of nodule shrinkage, symptom improvement score, thyroid function, hospital stay and cost were compared between the two procedures. Safety was defined by absence of major complications like recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and skin burn. Voice quality was assessed by a computerised multi-dimensional voice programme and a Voice Handicap Index (VHI) questionnaire 1-month after treatment.Results: Altogether, 43 patients had HIFU and 103 patients had a hemithyroidectomy. In the HIFU group, the extent of nodule shrinkage at 6-month was 51.71 ± 16.04%. No patients in the HIFU group suffered skin burn or hypothyroidism. The HIFU group had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (0.3 vs. 1.0 day, p < 0.001), lower incidence of subclinical hypothyroidism (1/43 vs. 21/103, p = 0.008), higher symptom improvement score (p = 0.009) and was less costly (USD 1923.1 vs. USD 5384.6). Relative to HIFU, pitch quality also worsen after surgery (p < 0.05).Conclusions: Relative to surgery, single HIFU ablation appeared efficacious and safe. Apart from shorter hospital stay, less subclinical hypothyroidism, being scar-less, lower cost and more symptom improvement, HIFU patients were less affected by a pitch problem in the first month. This study provides a strong argument for HIFU ablation as a treatment for symptomatic benign thyroid nodule.