Single-section counting error when distinguishing between primordial and early primary follicles in sections of rat ovary of different thickness.

Abstract

The number of primordial follicles within an ovary is frequently determined by counting 5, 7 or 10 microns thick sections and multiplying by the fraction of sections counted and a correction factor to adjust for duplicate counts. The objectives of the present study were: (i) to evaluate the accuracy of the correction factor developed by Abercrombie (1946); (ii) to evaluate the accuracy of the classification of primordial follicles from single tissue sections; and (iii) to determine the incorporation rate of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine into primordial follicles. In Expt 1, rat ovaries were sectioned at a thickness of 5, 7 or 10 microns. Primordial follicles were counted and classified across ten adjacent ovarian sections. The percentage of primordial follicles from single sections that were counted twice was 10, 9 and 2% in 5, 7 and 10 microns sections, respectively. This was lower than predicted by Abercrombie's method. The major error in counting from single sections was classification of early primary follicles as primordial follicles (55, 33 and 3% in 5, 7 and 10 microns sections, respectively). In Expt 2, a mean of 12 +/- 7% of primordial follicles incorporated 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine after infusion for 7 days (four of seven rats had no labelled primordial follicles). (i) Abercrombie's correction factor should not be used for adjusting counts of follicles; (ii) evaluation of primordial follicles from single sections gives inaccurate counts and incorrect classification is of greater importance than duplicate counting, particularly in thinner sections; (iii) for evaluation of the number of follicles, 10 microns is the optimal thickness; and (iv) primordial follicles incorporated 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine infrequently.