Abstract

PurposeA single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment to multiple brain metastatic patients is an efficient stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) option. However, the current clinical practice of single-isocenter SRS does not account for patient setup uncertainty, which degrades treatment delivery accuracy. This study quantifies the loss of target coverage and potential collateral dose to normal tissue due to clinically observable isocenter misalignment.Methods and materialsNine patients with 61 total tumors (2-16 tumors/patient) who underwent Gamma Knife® SRS were replanned in Eclipse™ using 10 megavoltages (MV) flattening-filter-free (FFF) bream (2400 MU/min), using a single-isocenter VMAT plan, similar to HyperArc™ VMAT plan. Isocenter was placed in the geometric center of the tumors. The prescription was 20 Gy to each tumor. Average gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) were 1.1 cc (0.02-11.5 cc) and 1.9 cc (0.11-18.8 cc), respectively, derived from MRI images. The average isocenter to tumor distance was 5.5 cm (1.6-10.1 cm). Six-degrees of freedom (6DoF) random and systematic residual set up errors within [±2 mm, ±2o] were generated using an in-house script in Eclipse based on our pre-treatment daily cone-beam CT imaging shifts and recomputed for the simulated VMAT plan. Relative loss of target coverage as a function of tumor size and distance to isocenter were evaluated as well as collateral dose to organs-at risk (OAR).ResultsThe average beam-on time was less than six minutes. However, loss of target coverage for clinically observable setup errors were, on average, 7.9% (up to 73.1%) for the GTV (p < 0.001) and 21.5% for the PTV (up to 93.7%; p < 0.001). The correlation was found for both random and systematic residual setup errors with tumor sizes; there was a greater loss of target coverage for small tumors. Due to isocenter misalignment, OAR doses fluctuated and potentially receive higher doses than the original plan.ConclusionA single-isocenter VMAT SRS treatment (similar to HyperArc™ VMAT) to multiple brain metastases was fast with < 6 min of beam-on time. However, due to small residual set up errors, single-isocenter VMAT, in its current use, is not an accurate SRS treatment modality for multiple brain metastases. Loss of target coverage was statistically significant, especially for smaller lesions, and may not be clinically acceptable if left uncorrected. Further investigation of correction strategies is underway.

Highlights

  • Multiple brain metastases are common among cancer patients

  • Six-degrees of freedom (6DoF) random and systematic residual set up errors within [±2 mm, ±2o] were generated using an in-house script in Eclipse based on our pre-treatment daily cone-beam CT imaging shifts and recomputed for the simulated volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan

  • Twenty to fifty percent of cancer patients develop brain metastases, with the most common primary malignancies being lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma [1]. This was treated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), which resulted in normal tissue toxicities such as memory loss, hair loss, pituitary dysfunction, and diminished hearing, and positive treatment outcomes were not achieved [2]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Multiple brain metastases are common among cancer patients. Twenty to fifty percent of cancer patients develop brain metastases, with the most common primary malignancies being lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma [1]. This was treated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), which resulted in normal tissue toxicities such as memory loss, hair loss, pituitary dysfunction, and diminished hearing, and positive treatment outcomes were not achieved (with 100% failure at one year) [2]. A randomized trial from the MD Anderson Cancer Center on SRS of multiple brain metastases patients with or without WBRT demonstrated inferior neurocognitive results in the cohort who had received WBRT in addition to SRS [3]. Of the stereotactic treatment modalities for treating multiple metastases, Gamma Knife®

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call