Abstract

Belief updating—the process by which an agent alters an internal model of its environment—is a core function of the CNS. Recent theory has proposed broad principles by which belief updating might operate, but more precise details of its implementation in the human brain remain unclear. In order to address this question, we studied how two components of the human event-related potential encoded different aspects of belief updating. Participants completed a novel perceptual learning task while electroencephalography was recorded. Participants learned the mapping between the contrast of a dynamic visual stimulus and a monetary reward and updated their beliefs about a target contrast on each trial. A Bayesian computational model was formulated to estimate belief states at each trial and was used to quantify the following two variables: belief update size and belief uncertainty. Robust single-trial regression was used to assess how these model-derived variables were related to the amplitudes of the P3 and the stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), respectively. Results showed a positive relationship between belief update size and P3 amplitude at one fronto-central electrode, and a negative relationship between SPN amplitude and belief uncertainty at a left central and a right parietal electrode. These results provide evidence that belief update size and belief uncertainty have distinct neural signatures that can be tracked in single trials in specific ERP components. This, in turn, provides evidence that the cognitive mechanisms underlying belief updating in humans can be described well within a Bayesian framework.

Highlights

  • In an uncertain and dynamically changing world, survival depends upon having accurate beliefs about the Received July 8, 2015; accepted September 16, 2015; First published September 28, 2015

  • We found that two event-related potential (ERP) components, P3 and stimulus-preceding negativity, respectively encoded belief update size and belief uncertainty

  • The present study addressed these questions by comparing Bayesian and heuristic accounts of belief updating, and by assessing how Bayesian belief updating was associated with two event-related potential (ERP) components typically linked with prediction and learning: the P3 and the stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In an uncertain and dynamically changing world, survival depends upon having accurate beliefs about the Received July 8, 2015; accepted September 16, 2015; First published September 28, 2015.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call