Abstract

There is significant current interest in decoding mental states from electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. EEG signals are subject-specific, are sensitive to disturbances, and have a low signal-to-noise ratio, which has been mitigated by the use of laboratory-grade EEG acquisition equipment under highly controlled conditions. In the present study, we investigate single-trial decoding of natural, complex stimuli based on scalp EEG acquired with a portable, 32 dry-electrode sensor system in a typical office setting. We probe generalizability by a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation approach. We demonstrate that support vector machine (SVM) classifiers trained on a relatively small set of denoised (averaged) pseudotrials perform on par with classifiers trained on a large set of noisy single-trial samples. We propose a novel method for computing sensitivity maps of EEG-based SVM classifiers for visualization of EEG signatures exploited by the SVM classifiers. Moreover, we apply an NPAIRS resampling framework for estimation of map uncertainty, and thus show that effect sizes of sensitivity maps for classifiers trained on small samples of denoised data and large samples of noisy data are similar. Finally, we demonstrate that the average pseudotrial classifier can successfully predict the class of single trials from withheld subjects, which allows for fast classifier training, parameter optimization, and unbiased performance evaluation in machine learning approaches for brain decoding.

Highlights

  • Decoding of brain activity aims to predict the perceptual and semantic content of neural processing based on activity measured in one or more brain imaging modalities, such as electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging

  • We report effect sizes of event-related potential (ERP) difference maps and sensitivity maps for evaluation of both support vector machine (SVM) classifiers

  • After EEG data preprocessing and artifact subspace reconstruction (ASR) (Section 2.5), we confirmed that our visual stimuli presentation elicited a visual evoked response. e ERPs for the trials of animate content and the trials of inanimate content are compared in Figure 2. e grand average ERPs across subjects are shown along with the average animate and inanimate ERPs of each subject. e average scalp map for these two supercategories as well as the difference between them at 310 ms is displayed in z-scored units

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Decoding of brain activity aims to predict the perceptual and semantic content of neural processing based on activity measured in one or more brain imaging modalities, such as electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Decoding studies based on fMRI have matured significantly during the last 15 years [1, 2], and human brain activity has been successfully decoded from natural images and movies [3,4,5,6,7,8]. EEGbased decoding of human brain activity has significant potential due to excellent time resolution and the possibility of real-life acquisition; the signal is extremely diverse, subject-specific, sensitive to disturbances, and has a low signal-to-noise ratio; posing a major challenge for both signal processing and machine learning [16]. A number of participants are occasionally excluded from analysis due to artifacts and low classification accuracy [13, 15]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call