Abstract

In this paper I argue that Sri Lanka has failed to reach a consensus concerning post-war constitutional reform. The main challenge is posed by the two main communities – the Sinhalese and the Tamils – being preoccupied with what I present as ‘single stories’. I invite the readers to see how such single-tracked metanarratives lead to ‘pathdependencies’ that hinder our ability to think anew of constitutional reform. Building on doctrinal foundations that explore the ‘rogue’ other, ethnic outbidding, tyrannies, and separatist ‘nationalism’, I present one story of how our fragmented constitutional consciousness defines the constitutional reform processes thereby forewarning its failure.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.