Single site versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: some pain for no gain?

Abstract

The optimal laparoscopic appendectomy approach is not clear, comparing single site laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) to conventional 3-port appendectomy (CLA). We investigated outcomes in pediatric patients comparing SILA to CLA: length of operation, length of stay, time to resumption of regular diet, follow up, rehospitalization, and cost. Data was collected from children 1 to 18 years with appendectomy at Loma Linda University from 2018 to 2020, operated by two surgeons. Analysis utilized two-sample T, chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests. Of 173 patients, 77 underwent SILA and 96 had CLA. There was no gender, age, or race difference between groups. Mean WBC was 17.5×103/mL in SILA group, compared to 15.3×103/mL in CLA group (P=0.004). Operative time was 47.0 SILA compared to 49.5 minutes CLA (P=0.269). Of SILA cases, 55.8% were simple appendicitis, while 53.3% of the CLA cases were simple (P=0.857). Regular diet was resumed after 1.7 days in the SILA group, 1.1 days in CLA (P=0.018). Length of stay was 2.9 days for SILA, 2.4 days for CLA (P=0.144). Seven children required hospital readmission, 5 SILA and 2 CLA (P=0.244). Five of the children who returned had intra-abdominal abscesses, of whom 4 had SILA. There was no difference in cost. The operative techniques had similar outcomes and operative times. There was a trend toward more intra-abdominal abscesses in the SILA group. Further study and longer follow up is needed to determine if there is an advantage to one laparoscopic approach over another.