Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique used to modulate cortical activity. However, measured effects on clinically relevant assessments have been inconsistent, possibly due to the non-focal dispersion of current from traditional two electrode configurations. High-definition (HD)-tDCS uses a small array of electrodes (N = 5) to improve targeted current delivery. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a single session of anodal and cathodal HD-tDCS on gait kinematics and kinetics and the corticomotor response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in individuals post-stroke. We hypothesized that ipsilesional anodal stimulation would increase the corticomotor response to TMS leading to beneficial changes in gait. Eighteen participants post-stroke (average age: 64.8 years, SD: 12.5; average months post-stroke: 54, SD: 42; average lower extremity Fugl-Meyer score: 26, SD: 6) underwent biomechanical and corticomotor response testing on three separate occasions prior to and after HD-tDCS stimulation. In a randomized order, anodal, cathodal, and sham HD-tDCS were applied to the ipsilesional motor cortex for 20 min while participants pedaled on a recumbent cycle ergometer. Gait kinetic and kinematic data were collected while walking on an instrumented split-belt treadmill with motion capture. The corticomotor response of the paretic and non-paretic tibialis anterior (TA) muscles were measured using neuronavigated TMS. Repeated measures ANOVAs using within-subject factors of time point (pre, post) and stimulation type (sham, anodal, cathodal) were used to compare effects of HD-tDCS stimulation on measured variables. HD-tDCS had no effect on over ground walking speed (P > 0.41), or kinematic variables (P > 0.54). The corticomotor responses of the TA muscles were also unaffected by HD-tDCS (resting motor threshold, P = 0.15; motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, P = 0.25; MEP normalized latency, P = 0.66). A single session of anodal or cathodal HD-tDCS delivered to a standardized ipsilesional area of the motor cortex does not appear to alter gait kinematics or corticomotor response post-stroke. Repeated sessions and individualized delivery of HD-tDCS may be required to induce beneficial plastic effects. Contralesional stimulation should also be investigated due to the altered interactions between the cerebral hemispheres post-stroke.

Highlights

  • Less than 50% of individuals post-stroke return to independent community ambulation (Jorgensen et al, 1995) and 73% have some type of long term disability (Gresham et al, 1995)

  • Two individuals failed to screen into the study and one participant was removed because they had no discernable corticomotor response leaving a final sample of 18

  • We modeled the delivery of HDtDCS current to the tibialis anterior (TA) representation of ipsilesional M1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Less than 50% of individuals post-stroke return to independent community ambulation (Jorgensen et al, 1995) and 73% have some type of long term disability (Gresham et al, 1995). Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques have been proposed to enhance the beneficial plastic effects of post-stroke rehabilitation (Fregni and Pascual-Leone, 2007) One such technique is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) which involves the application of direct current, usually 1–2 mA, to the scalp over a targeted cortical area (Woods et al, 2016). While some beneficial clinical effects have been seen with traditional tDCS, imaging and finite element modeling studies demonstrate that current flow may be concentrated in areas away from targeted neuronal populations when using traditional two electrode montages (Datta et al, 2010; Antal et al, 2011). Due to the location of the sensorimotor cortical representation of the lower extremities deep within the cortex along the longitudinal fissure utilizing more targeted current delivery with HD-tDCS may enhance outcomes related to motor rehabilitation and nervous system plasticity in chronic stroke, especially when compared with traditional tDCS

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call