Abstract

Few studies have evaluated the association between a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based genetic risk score (GRS) and patient age at prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. To test the association between a GRS and patient age at PCa diagnosis and to compare the performance of a GRS with that of family history (FH) in PCa risk stratification. A cohort study of 3225 white men was conducted as a secondary analysis of the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) chemoprevention trial, a 4-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study conducted from March 2003 to April 2009 to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dutasteride in reducing PCa events. Participants were confirmed to be cancer free by prostate biopsy (6-12 cores) within 6 months prior to the study and underwent 10 core biopsies every 2 years per protocol. The dates for performing data analysis were from July 2016 to October 2019. A well-established, population-standardized GRS was calculated for each participant based on 110 known PCa risk-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms, which is a relative risk compared with the general population. Men were classified into 3 GRS risk groups based on predetermined cutoff values: low (<0.50), average (0.50-1.49), and high (≥1.50). Prostate cancer diagnosis-free survival among men of different risk groups. Among 3225 men (median age, 63 years [interquartile range, 58-67 years]) in the study, 683 (21%) were classified as low risk, 1937 (60%) as average risk, and 605 (19%) as high risk based on GRS alone. In comparison, 2789 (86%) were classified as low or average risk and 436 (14%) as high risk based on FH alone. Men in higher GRS risk groups had a PCa diagnosis-free survival rate that was worse than that of those in the lower GRS risk group (χ2 = 53.3; P < .001 for trend) and in participants with a negative FH of PCa (χ2 = 45.5; P < .001 for trend). Combining GRS and FH further stratified overall genetic risk, indicating that 957 men (30%) were at high genetic risk (either high GRS or positive FH), 1667 men (52%) were at average genetic risk (average GRS and negative FH), and 601 men (19%) were at low genetic risk (low GRS and negative FH). The median PCa diagnosis-free survival was 74 years (95% CI, 73-75 years) for men at high genetic risk, 77 years (95% CI, 75 to >80 years) for men at average genetic risk, and more than 80 years (95% CI, >80 to >80 years) for men at low genetic risk. In contrast, the median PCa diagnosis-free survival was 73 years (95% CI, 71-76 years) for men with a positive FH and 77 years (95% CI, 76-79 years) for men with a negative FH. This study suggests that a GRS is significantly associated with patient age at PCa diagnosis. Combining FH and GRS may better stratify inherited risk than FH alone for developing personalized PCa screening strategies.

Highlights

  • Population-based prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer (PCa) has been subject to intense scrutiny owing to the potential harms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.[1]

  • This study suggests that a genetic risk score (GRS) is significantly associated with patient age at PCa diagnosis

  • During the 4-year follow-up of 3225 participants included in the genetic subcohort of the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial (1644 participants from the placebo group and 1581 participants from the dutasteride group), a diagnosis of PCa was made for 714 participants (22%), and a diagnosis of high-grade PCa was made for 237 participants (7%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Population-based prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer (PCa) has been subject to intense scrutiny owing to the potential harms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.[1] Despite data supporting a mortality benefit from population screening, it remains unclear which patient groups have the most favorable risk-benefit ratio from screening.[2] Currently, all professional guidelines recommend that age, family history (FH), and race/ethnicity be considered to identify subsets of men who may benefit the most from PSA screening.[3,4,5,6] The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends a discussion about the benefits and harms of PSA screening for men aged 55 to 69 years and states that FH and race/ethnicity be considered in determining whether earlier PSA screening is appropriate for individual men.[3] Both FH and race/ethnicity are used to measure the inherited risk for PCa, a disease with strong heritability (h2 = 0.57).[7] FH and race/ethnicity are indirect measurements of inherited risk, which can be associated with environmental exposures. With advances in DNA sequencing and genotyping technologies and the identification of specific PCa susceptibility genes and variants,[8,9,10] it is feasible to include direct DNA measurements as part of inherited risk assessment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call