Abstract

PurposeTo test a single-energy low-voltage CT protocol for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods and materialsA total of 30 patients with pathology-proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent 64-row MDCT with arterial phase at 80kV and were compared to a similar group of 30 patients scanned with a 120kV protocol. Scans were compared for quantitative image parameters (attenuation and standard deviation in the pancreas, tumor, aorta), CTDI and DLP using an unpaired t-test. Image noise values for each protocol (SD of the psoas) were compared using an unpaired t-test. Effective dose was calculated for each protocol. CNR (=conspicuity/SDnoise) and FOM (CNR2/ED) were calculated. The Catphan600 phantom was used to evaluate image non-uniformity, noise, spatial resolution, and low contrast detectability. ResultsMean patient weight was 68kg in the study group and 73kg in the control group (p=0.0355), while patient diameters at the celiac axis were not significantly different. Mean attenuation was significantly higher at 80kV in the aorta (517.5±116.4 vs 290.3±76.4HU) and normal pancreas (154.0±39.95 vs 90.02±19.01HU) (all p<0.0001), while no significant difference was observed for adenocarcinoma (61.43±35.61 vs 47.45±18.95; p=n.s.). CTDI and DLP were significantly lower at 80kV (6.00±0.90mGy vs 10.24±2.93mGy, and 180.4±35.49mGycm vs 383.8±117mGycm, respectively; all p<0.0001). Tumor conspicuity (HUpancreas−HUtumor) was significantly higher at 80kV (94.2±39.3 vs 39.5±22HU; p<0.0001). Mean image noise was significantly higher at 80kV (28.32±10.06 vs 19.7±7.1HU; p<0.0001). Effective dose was significantly lower at 80kV (1.984±0.39 vs 5.75±1.75mSv; p<0.0001). The total DLP for the exam was 1024±31.86mGycm for the 80kV protocol and 1357±62.60mGycm for the 120kV protocol (p<0.0001).Phantoms showed higher non-uniformity, slightly higher noise, slightly lower MTF (50%) and slightly higher percentage contrast for the 80kV protocol. ConclusionSingle-source 80kV pancreatic phase scanning results in higher conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and FOM and in significant dose reduction while maintaining acceptable image quality.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call