Abstract

BackgroundMacrophages are the most common infiltrating immune cells in gliomas and play a wide variety of pro-tumor and anti-tumor roles. However, the different subpopulations of macrophages and their effects on the tumor microenvironment remain poorly understood.MethodsWe combined new and previously published single-cell RNA-seq data from 98,015 single cells from a total of 66 gliomas to profile 19,331 individual macrophages.ResultsUnsupervised clustering revealed a pro-tumor subpopulation of bone marrow-derived macrophages characterized by the scavenger receptor MARCO, which is almost exclusively found in IDH1-wild-type glioblastomas. Previous studies have implicated MARCO as an unfavorable marker in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer; here, we find that bulk MARCO expression is associated with worse prognosis and mesenchymal subtype. Furthermore, MARCO expression is significantly altered over the course of treatment with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors in a response-dependent manner, which we validate with immunofluorescence imaging.ConclusionsThese findings illustrate a novel macrophage subpopulation that drives tumor progression in glioblastomas and suggest potential therapeutic targets to prevent their recruitment.

Highlights

  • Macrophages are the most common infiltrating immune cells in gliomas and play a wide variety of pro-tumor and anti-tumor roles

  • Looking at the expression of MARCO in all cell populations, we found that it is found in this subpopulation of macrophages (Additional file 3: Fig. S3A)

  • Absence of MARCO expression in Lower-grade glioma (LGG) and IDH1-mutant GBM We investigated whether this macrophage subpopulation could be observed in lower-grade gliomas (LGGs), which include grade II and III astrocytomas as well as oligodendrogliomas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Macrophages are the most common infiltrating immune cells in gliomas and play a wide variety of pro-tumor and anti-tumor roles. Chen et al Genome Medicine (2021) 13:88 Targeting these TAMs (such as with CSF1R inhibitors) is an intriguing therapeutic option but requires a better understanding of markers specific to and necessary for TAM functioning [9,10,11]. Our classical knowledge of macrophage polarization (M1 vs M2) provides a simplified illustration of these different states [4]. This is clearly not the whole picture, given that M1 and M2 genes are often co-expressed in individual TAMs [12]. The specific markers and pathways involved in pro-tumor macrophages in GBM still remain elusive

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call