Abstract

STUDY QUESTIONWhat are the characteristics of progesterone-induced (CatSper-mediated) single cell [Ca2+]i signals in spermatozoa from sub-fertile men and how do they relate to fertilizing ability?SUMMARY ANSWERSingle cell analysis of progesterone-induced (CatSper-mediated) [Ca2+]i showed that reduced progesterone-sensitivity is a common feature of sperm from sub-fertile patients and is correlated with fertilization rate.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYStimulation with progesterone is a widely used method for assessing [Ca2+]i mobilization by activation of CatSper in human spermatozoa. Although data are limited, sperm population studies have indicated an association of poor [Ca2+]i response to progesterone with reduced fertilization ability.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATIONThis was a cohort study using semen samples from 21 donors and 101 patients attending the assisted conception unit at Ninewells Hospital Dundee who were undergoing ART treatment. Patients were recruited from January 2016 to June 2017.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSSemen donors and patients were recruited in accordance with local ethics approval (13/ES/0091) from the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (EoSRES) REC1. [Ca2+]i responses were examined by single cell imaging and motility parameters assessed by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA).MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEFor analysis, patient samples were divided into three groups IVF(+ve) (successful fertilization; 62 samples), IVF-FF (failed fertilization; eight samples) and ICSI (21 samples). A further 10 IVF samples showed large, spontaneous [Ca2+]i oscillations and responses to progesterone could not be analysed. All patient samples loaded with the [Ca2+]i-indicator fluo4 responded to progesterone stimulation with a biphasic increase in fluorescence (transient followed by plateau) which resembled that seen in progesterone-stimulated donor samples. The mean normalized response (progesterone-induced increase in fluorescence normalized to resting level) was significantly smaller in IVF-FF and ICSI patient groups than in donors. All samples were further analysed by plotting, for each cell, the relationship between resting fluorescence intensity and the progesterone-induced fluorescence increment. In donor samples these plots overlaid closely and had a gradient of ≈ 2 and plots for most IVF(+ve) samples closely resembled the donor distribution. However, in a subset (≈ 10%) of IVF(+ve) samples, 3/8 IVF-FF samples and one-third of ICSI samples the gradient of the plot was significantly lower, indicating that the response to progesterone of the cells in these samples was abnormally small. Examination of the relationship between gradient (regression coefficient of the plot) in IVF samples and fertilization rate showed a positive correlation. In IVF-FF and ICSI groups, the proportion of cells in which a response to progesterone could be detected was significantly lower than in donors and IVF (+ve) patients. Approximately 20% of cells in donor, IVF(+ve) and ICSI samples generated [Ca2+]i oscillations when challenged with progesterone but in IVF-FF samples only ≈ 10% of cells generated oscillations and there was a significantly greater proportion of samples where no oscillations were observed. Levels of hyperactivated motility were lower in IVF(+ve) and IVF-FF groups compared to controls, IVF-FF also having lower levels than IVF(+ve).LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONThis is an in vitro study and caution must be taken when extrapolating these results in vivo.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSThis study reveals important details of impaired [Ca2+]i signalling in sperm from sub-fertile men that cannot be detected in population studies.STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)This study was funded by a MRC project grant (MR/M012492/1; MR/K013343/1). Additional funding was provided by Chief Scientist Office/NHS research Scotland.

Highlights

  • Sperm dysfunction is commonly regarded as the single most common cause of infertility yet there is a paucity of non-ART treatments available (Martins da Silva et al, 2017)

  • Mouse sperm null for CatSper are sterile (Ren et al, 2001) and previous studies on sperm from ART patients revealed impaired [Ca2+]i handling and reduced ability to respond to P4, in samples that subsequently failed to fertilise at IVF, indicating that CatSper lesions may underlie reduced fertility in these men (Krausz et al, 1995, 1996; Alasmari et al, 2013a) Recently Williams et al (2015) combined screening of P4-induced [Ca2+]i signals with direct assessment of CatSper currents to show that a complete lack of functional

  • CatSper channels are the main source of Ca2+ entry in human sperm (Brenker et al, 2012), and studies in which CatSper activity and fertility of sperm populations have been assessed suggest that even minor abnormalities of CatSper function may affect fertility (Krausz et al, 1995, 1996; Qi et al, 2007; Lishko and Kirichok 2010; Williams et al, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sperm dysfunction is commonly regarded as the single most common cause of infertility yet there is a paucity of non-ART treatments available (Martins da Silva et al, 2017). CatSper, the primary Ca2+-influx channel of sperm, is weakly voltage-sensitive and is activated by intracellular alkalinisation, but in human sperm is sensitive to a variety of ligands, the best-characterised of which is progesterone (P4; Lishko et al, 2011; Strunker et al, 2011). P4 may cause strong activation of the channel as sperm approach the oocyte, the consequent Ca2+ influx regulating activities required for fertilisation (Lishko et al, 2012). Mouse sperm null for CatSper are sterile (Ren et al, 2001) and previous studies on sperm from ART patients revealed impaired [Ca2+]i handling and reduced ability to respond to P4, in samples that subsequently failed to fertilise at IVF, indicating that CatSper lesions may underlie reduced fertility in these men (Krausz et al, 1995, 1996; Alasmari et al, 2013a) Recently Williams et al (2015) combined screening of P4-induced [Ca2+]i signals with direct assessment of CatSper currents to show that a complete lack of functional

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.