Abstract

BackgroundAs a campus building, the new campus of colleges and universities is more likely to become the representative of educational buildings because of its economic advantages, diversity of design methods, land use and plot ratio. Colleges and universities implement the advanced concepts of modern urban construction and higher education development, implement high starting point planning, and invite well-known experts at home and abroad to design single building schemes to highlight the characteristics of campus culture. The architectural design of the new campus is the main feature of campus modernization. It must be designed before any construction project starts. In order to solve the problem that the evaluation method of single building design scheme in the new campus of colleges and universities does not consider the influence of different financing results. There are still operational difficulties in determining indicators that cannot be measured by architectural style and social benefits. At the same time, the construction of university parks should also help alleviate students' anxiety and depression.Research Objects and MethodsOn the basis of qualitative index evaluation, the utility theory and projection method of multi-attribute decision-making using language variables are introduced. According to the evaluation data of more than 20 provinces and cities in China, the single scheme of new campus construction of colleges and universities is divided into overall target layer, macro target layer and micro target layer. According to the system evaluation index system, the macro objective layer is composed of four objectives: technical feasibility, economic feasibility, construction and environmental impact, as well as social, political and economic significance. The micro target layer is the subdivided macro target layer, as shown in Table 1. It includes 29 quantitative and qualitative indicators. The qualitative index is transformed into interval number, the financing effect is quantified by defining utility function, and the evaluation model of single building design scheme under the influence of different financing effects is established. At the same time, this study uses the emotional Self-evaluation Scale, which is used to evaluate one aspect of self-evaluation - self-confidence.ResultsIt is generally believed that self-confidence is a person's feeling of his ability or skills and a subjective evaluation of his ability to effectively cope with various environments. As a self-assessment tool, Pei does not cover as wide a range as some existing scales, such as Rosenberg's self-esteem scale. But it can estimate most problems in the field of self-confidence. The six most frequently mentioned dimensions are used as their subscales; Academic performance, sports, appearance, love relationships, social interactions and conversations with people. In addition to these subscales, there are also some items to evaluate the overall level of self-confidence and the state of mind that may affect the judgment of self-confidence. The selection of items is based on the following four criteria: high correlation between items and subscales, low correlation with other subscales, low correlation with Marlowe crown social expectation scale, and balance the items of positive tone narration and negative tone narration in each subscale. Except that the sports subscale includes 5 items, the other subscales have 7 items respectively, with a total of 54 items. They are scored at level 4, with a total score range of 54216. The higher the score, the higher the degree of self-confidence.ConclusionAccording to the model, different financing factors K are used to select the optimal design scheme. Finally, the operation process of the model is explained through empirical analysis, which provides a new comprehensive evaluation method for the selection of single building design scheme in the new campus of colleges and universities. The selection of single building design scheme in the new campus of colleges and universities should consider the possible impact on the construction scale, construction content, construction investment and other indicators on the premise of considering the influence of financing effect. In order to select the best financing effect design scheme, so as to reduce the investment risk brought by the financing effect to the construction of a single campus. This is a further improvement of the existing monomer design scheme comparison system. Through a comparative study of the impact of the construction of University Parks on the suicidal ideation of depressed students, this study found that the scientific design of university parks can improve the suicidal ideation of depressed patients, which can not only effectively improve the depression and suicidal attitude of patients, but also enable them to face difficulties and setbacks rationally and better adapt to the society, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call