Abstract

BackgroundDiffuse myocardial fibrosis may be quantified with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) by calculating extra-cellular volume (ECV) from native and post-contrast T1 values. Accurate ECV calculation is dependent upon the contrast agent having reached equilibrium within tissue compartments. Previous studies have used infusion or single bolus injections of contrast to calculate ECV. In clinical practice however, split dose contrast injection is commonly used as part of stress/rest perfusion studies. In this study we sought to assess the effects of split dose versus single bolus contrast administration on ECV calculation.MethodsTen healthy volunteers and five patients ( 4 ischaemic heart disease, 1 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) were studied on a 3.0 Tesla (Philips Achieva TX) MR system and underwent two (patients) or three (volunteers) separate CMR studies over a mean of 12 and 30 days respectively. Volunteers underwent one single bolus contrast study (Gadovist 0.15mmol/kg). In two further studies, contrast was given in two boluses (0.075mmol/kg per bolus) as part of a clinical adenosine stress/rest perfusion protocol, boluses were separated by 12 minutes. Patients underwent one bolus and one stress perfusion study only. T1 maps were acquired pre contrast and 15 minutes following the single bolus or second contrast injection.ResultsECV agreed between bolus and split dose contrast administration (coefficient of variability 5.04%, bias 0.009, 95% CI −3.754 to 3.772, r2 = 0.973, p = 0.001)). Inter-study agreement with split dose administration was good (coefficient of variability, 5.67%, bias −0.018, 95% CI −4.045 to 4.009, r2 = 0.766, p > 0.001).ConclusionECV quantification using split dose contrast administration is reproducible and agrees well with previously validated methods in healthy volunteers, as well as abnormal and remote myocardium in patients. This suggests that clinical perfusion CMR studies may incorporate assessment of tissue composition by ECV based on T1 mapping.

Highlights

  • Diffuse myocardial fibrosis may be quantified with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) by calculating extra-cellular volume (ECV) from native and post-contrast T1 values

  • * Correspondence: s.plein@leeds.ac.uk 1Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK Full list of author information is available at the end of the article. This technique relies upon the presence of healthy myocardium to detect scar, and as a result is limited in the detection of diffuse myocardial disease processes where global myocardial extra-cellular matrix (ECM) expansion occurs

  • Previous studies have shown that ECV calculated using either an infusion or bolus of contrast agent [12] is reproducible, and correlates well with fibrosis measured on myocardial biopsy specimens [19]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diffuse myocardial fibrosis may be quantified with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) by calculating extra-cellular volume (ECV) from native and post-contrast T1 values. In this study we sought to assess the effects of split dose versus single bolus contrast administration on ECV calculation. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging is well suited for the detection of focal myocardial scar that characterises a number of disease processes [6,7]. This technique relies upon the presence of healthy myocardium to detect scar, and as a result is limited in the detection of diffuse myocardial disease processes where global myocardial ECM expansion occurs. The ability to accurately define myocardial composition allows for the detection of sub-clinical disease states and may enable the effects of intervention on tissue composition to be determined non-invasively [10].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call