Abstract
IntroductionThe purpose of this study is to identify and compare demographic, clinical, historical, and intra-operative variables in patients who have received arthroscopic treatment for single versus multiple anterior shoulder dislocations. MethodsThis is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent arthroscopic labral repair of the shoulder by six surgeons at a single institution between 2012-2020. Patients with a documented anterior shoulder dislocation were included. Patients with pain-only, subluxation-only, multi-directional or posterior instability, and prior shoulder surgeries of any kind were excluded. Studied variables included age, sex, laterality, body mass index, contact/collision sports, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tobacco use, number of dislocations (1, >1), labral tear size, time from first dislocation to surgery, anchor number, and concomitant procedures. Study groups were compared using student’s t-tests and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Chi-Square or Fisher’s Exact tests for discrete variables with a significance of 0.05. Results633 patients were identified and 351 [85 single dislocators (SD), 266 multiple dislocators (MD)] met inclusion criteria (mean age: 27 years; range: 14-71 years). There were no demographic differences between study groups. SD received surgery significantly sooner at 17 ± 44 months after injury, while MD received surgery 53 ± 74 months post-initial dislocation. SD (30/85, 35%) were significantly more likely than MD (56/266, 21%) to receive concomitant posterior labrum repair. MD (46/266, 17%) were significantly more likely than SD (5/85, 6%) to receive a Remplissage. SD (11/85, 13%) were significantly more likely than MD (11/266, 4%) to receive a concomitant biceps tenotomy/tenodesis. There were no other significant differences in injury or surgery characteristics. ConclusionMD will have more time between their initial dislocation and arthroscopic labral repair and were more likely to receive a Remplissage procedure, yet were less likely than SD to receive a concomitant posterior labral repair or biceps tenodesis/tenotomy despite no differences in age, sex, and activity level. Whether the greater extent of labrum injury in SD is due to a more severe initial injury versus earlier recognition and intervention requires further study.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.