Abstract
Background: Some interpolators cannot be used in an image magnification problem in a freely scalable form. For instance, when we want to magnify an image to a 16-time bigger scale, some interpolators have to do this process in two steps including two 4-time magnification steps, however, some are able to do it directly. Materials and Methods: For generating data of this study, MATLAB as a simulator has been used. Bi-; Linear (BL) and Cubic Convolution (CC) interpolators are the two applied re-samplers in the reconstruction of digital images. Results: Data shows that the performance of both free-size interpolators (BL and CC) is obviously different in both direct and indirect pixel reconstruction. Conclusion: The acquired data shows a less error in the condition of direct interpolation. The relative results of experiments are different from the type of core interpolators (BL and CC).
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.