Abstract
To see whether UK media coverage during the MPs’ expenses scandal followed partisan newspaper orientations, we analysed reporting from: a set of right-leaning (Daily Mail, The Times and Daily Telegraph) and left-leaning (The Guardian, The Independent) papers; the most widely read daily (The Sun); and a regional newspaper (The Scotsman). We found that, ceteris paribus, MPs received higher levels of coverage across all newspapers if they were on the front bench for one of the three major parties, misappropriated higher sums of money, received more media coverage before the scandal, or were female. However, there were no significant partisan differences between the newspapers under study. Thus, newspapers acted as watchdogs rather than in a partisan fashion during the expenses scandal.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
