Abstract
This paper provides an account of anonymous speech treated as anonymized speech. It is argued that anonymous speech acts are best defined by reference to intentional acts of blocking a speaker's identification as opposed to the various epistemic effects that imperfectly correlate with these actions. The account is used to examine two important subclasses of anonymized speech: speech using pseudonyms, and speech anonymized in a specifically communicative manner. Several pragmatic and ethical issues with anonymized speech are considered.
Highlights
This paper provides an account of anonymous speech treated as anonymized speech
The aim of this paper is to present a new account of the nature of anonymity
An anonymized speech act is subject to moral and rational appraisal to determine whether the anonymizing devices are warranted
Summary
This paper provides an account of anonymous speech treated as anonymized speech. It is argued that anonymous speech acts are best defined by reference to intentional acts of blocking a speaker's identification as opposed to the various epistemic effects that imperfectly correlate with these actions. The account is used to examine two important subclasses of anonymized speech: speech using pseudonyms, and speech anonymized in a communicative manner. Several pragmatic and ethical issues with anonymized speech are considered
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have