Abstract
The present study compares the ability of two semi-predictive approaches, namely the Global Phase Diagram approach (GPDA) and predictive Soave−Redlich−Kwong (PSRK), to describe the experimental data in the binary homologous series of perfluoromethane−alkanes. Although this time PSRK is able to describe the patterns of phase behavior in the series under consideration, it fails to predict the data quantitatively. In particular, it underestimates the liquid−liquid equilibria (LLE) range for the light members of the homologous series and overestimates it for the heavy members. In very asymmetric systems, the predictions of PSRK are in total disagreement with the experimental data. In addition, because PSRK does not use the binary parameter l12, it generates an incorrect slope of the LLE critical lines and isopleths in pressure−temperature (P−T) projection. In contrast, GPDA predicts robust results, even for very asymmetric systems, and yields precise description of the more-symmetric ones. These facts confirm a doubtless advantage of the approach that is based on consideration of the complete phase diagram and not only of its separate parts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.