Abstract

The shallow accretionary prism of the Nankai Trough is a location where both large interplate earthquakes and slow earthquakes occur. Since the physical properties of sedimentary materials are important topics for understanding the structure of the prism, numerous ocean drilling expeditions have been conducted in that region to obtain logging data and core samples. Although the physical properties of the obtained samples are normally measured onboard immediately after coring, estimations of in situ physical properties are difficult because of differences in laboratory and in situ physical conditions. Herein, we propose a new method for estimating in situ porosity from downhole electrical resistivity log data that evaluates in situ porosity and thermal structure simultaneously using correlations between the porosity and resistivity, and between the porosity and thermal conductivity that were established based on laboratory measurements. When constructing physical property correlations, X-ray computed tomography data play an important role in estimating the porosity of samples from which resistivity or thermal conductivity were measured. To validate our method, we compared the estimation with density log data collected at Site C0002 and found that the estimated in situ porosity shows good agreement with the in situ porosity converted from density log data. A comparison with porosity measured onboard for core and cutting samples showed that they are consistent with each other. With this new method, continuous distributions of in situ porosity and thermal structure can be estimated simultaneously based on resistivity log data and heat flow, which are basic quantities acquired during ocean drilling science expeditions.

Highlights

  • Ocean drilling science provides a way to reveal the structure and physical properties of accretionary prisms (e.g., Tobin and Kinoshita 2006)

  • With a good initial thermal structure, the in situ porosity estimated from the initial thermal structure shows only a few percentage points of difference from the estimated porosity (Fig. 8a, c)

  • With a bad initial thermal structure, the in situ porosity estimated from the initial thermal structure and the estimated in situ porosity show differences of ~ 6% (Fig. 8b, c)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ocean drilling science provides a way to reveal the structure and physical properties of accretionary prisms (e.g., Tobin and Kinoshita 2006). Conin et al (2011) converted electrical resistivity log data to porosity using Archie’s law (Archie 1942). The parameters in Archie’s law were estimated by fitting the porosity measured onboard the research vessel after correcting for the smectite dehydration effect. Sugihara et al (2014) estimated in situ porosity from the resistivity, which they further converted to thermal conductivity, in order to calculate the thermal structure using empirical correlations between them. As the thermal structure needs to be assumed in order to convert electrical resistivity to in situ porosity, a thermal structure that is different from the one estimated is normally assumed for this conversion

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.