Abstract

Abstract : Effective simulator training is an important factor in the Air Force's overall ability to train pilots. A major problem is that simulator managers tend to assume that their machines are always optimally designed and used. In addition investigators find it difficult to evaluate simulator training in quantitative terms while working in an operational setting. These problems reflect the need for the Air Force to carefully consider current and future simulator designs and training programs. This study was designed to investigate procedural errors made at the F-15A Simulator Instructor/Operator Station (IOS) by instructor pilots (IPs). An observer recorded the number of errors and the time needed to correct each error during a typical 90-minute session. Questionnaires were filled out by 34 F-15 aircraft IPs and 16 F-15 simulator operators indicating their respective simulator experience. Data were collected during actual training missions to determine if IP errors seriously detracted from training time. The results showed that the average number of errors and average error time had an insignificant impact on simulator training. The number of simulator sessions flown by each IP in the course of the present study was identified as an important factor in effective simulator training, varying inversely with error counts. However, no relationship was found between total IP hours and average error count. In addition, the electronic tactics selected by the IP may have had an effect on average error count. Additional research is needed to determine if IOS modification will increase simulator training effectiveness.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call