Abstract
AbstractProjection‐based variational multiscale (VMS) methods, within the framework of an inf–sup stable second order finite element method for the Navier–Stokes equations, are studied in simulations of the turbulent channel flow problem at Reτ = 180. For comparison, the Smagorinsky large eddy simulation (LES) model with van Driest damping is included into the study. The simulations are performed on very coarse grids. The VMS methods give often considerably better results. For second order statistics, however, the differences to the reference values are sometimes rather large. The dependency of the results on parameters in the eddy viscosity model is much weaker for the VMS methods than for the Smagorinsky LES model with van Driest damping. It is shown that one uniform refinement of the coarse grids allows an underresolved direct numerical simulations (DNS). Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
