Simulations of Steam Methane Reforming/Sorption-Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactors by a Dynamic One-Dimensional Two-Fluid Model: Implementation Issues and Model Validation

Abstract

Multiphase flows and in particular dispersed flows are frequently encountered in a variety of important process facilities in the chemical industry; herein, the fluidized bed reactors. Whereas the internal and external solid fluxes in the fluidized bed reactors are generally determined by empirical correlations or prescribed in the Kunii–Levenspiel type of models, the two-fluid models serve as highly relevant in the progress of commercial reactors for processes such as the novel sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming (SE-SMR) technology because the solid flux incorporated in the two-fluid model allows for dynamic modeling of interconnected fluidized bed reactors. Nevertheless, the two- and three-dimensional two-fluid models are yet too computationally demanding for chemical process evaluation studies due to the complexity of the gas–solid flow in the bed. Hence, these models are not efficient for studies of the processes such as the SE-SMR technology where the solid particles are transported between reactor units for utilization and recovery of the characteristic solid property, i.e. CO2-capture and CO2-release. Thus, the aim of the present study is to derive a model that allows for a more complex description of the fluidized bed reactors relative to the frequently used Kunii–Levenspiel type of models. On the other hand, the model should not predict details in the flow, as the two- and three-dimensional two-fluid models, in order to ensure reasonable simulation costs. Hence, in this study, the classical SIMPLE algorithm is extended to compressible two-phase reactive flows. The governing equations are cross-sectional averaged to smooth out the details in the flow. The suggested dynamic one-dimensional Eulerian–Eulerian two-fluid model is applied to investigate the reactive gas–solid flows of the SMR and SE-SMR processes; and moreover, the simulation results are compared with the results of the more complex two-dimensional model with a solid stress closure based on kinetic theory of granular flow. The one-dimensional model predictions of the chemical process performance are in good agreement with the corresponding profiles predicted with the two-dimensional model. The deviations are larger comparing the internal flow details but these do not owe significant impact on the chemical process which to a large extent is determined by the imposed temperature in the reactor.