Abstract

The simulative capabilities of two elastoplastic constitutive models under three-dimensional stress conditions are investigated. The two models employ different frameworks in predicting the stress-strain and strength of soils. One is the isotropic Dafalias-Kaliakin bounding surface model that employs a critical state- based failure criterion and uses an associated flow rule. The other model is the Single Hardening model which employs the Lade's failure criterion and assumes a non- associated flow rule. The two models are used to simulate the stress-strain and strength behavior of six drained true triaxial tests with a constant mean effective stress but with different b-values on normally consolidated (NC) kaolin clay. The bounding surface model predicts overly small stress differences and large principal strains as compared to the experimental results. The Single Hardening model simulates the experimental results with much greater accuracy. It is found that the use of a realistic three-dimensional failure criterion and a non-associated flow rule better simulates the stress-strain and strength characteristics of NC clay under three- dimensional stress conditions than the use of a critical state framework in conjunction with associated flow rule.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.