Abstract

The performance of parallel programs such as fork-join jobs is significantly affected by the choice of policy used to schedule tasks. In this paper we present the results of a simulation study comparing three basic policies that schedule independent tasks in conjunction with resequencing of jobs. A closed queuing network model is considered; the CPU consists of homogeneous and independent processors, each serving its own queue. The simulation results reveal that the performance of the three policies is affected by the resequencing delay. It is shown that over a wide range of system parameters the first-come-first-served policy exhibits better performance than the policy that gives priority to tasks of a job having the smallest number of tasks. It is also shown that the policy that gives priority to the smallest task performs best when there are large variations in the task service times.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.