Abstract

The biomass gasification process is widely accepted as a popular technology to produce fuel for the application in gas turbines and Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). Chemical reactions of this process can be separated into three reaction zones: pyrolysis, combustion, and reduction. In this study, sensitivity analysis with respect to three input parameters (gasification temperature, equivalence ratio, and steam-to-biomass ratio) has been carried out to achieve energy self-sufficient conditions in a steam gasification process under the criteria that the carbon conversion efficiency must be more than 70%, and carbon dioxide gas is lower than 20%. Simulation models of the steam gasification process have been carried out by ASPEN Plus and validated with both experimental data and simulation results from Nikoo & Mahinpey (2008). Gasification temperature of 911 °C, equivalence ratio of 0.18, and a steam-to-biomass ratio of 1.78, are considered as an optimal operation point to achieve energy self-sufficient condition. This operating point gives the maximum of carbon conversion efficiency at 91.03%, and carbon dioxide gas at 15.18 volumetric percentages. In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) is included to compare the environmental performance of conventional and energy self-sufficient gasification for steam biomass gasification.

Highlights

  • With increasing energy demands of the world and environmental awareness, biomass gasification is an alternative technology to solve those problems. This technology can significantly reduce the volume of biomass waste generated in developing societies [1]

  • The results showed that the internal combustion engine and the Stirling engine proved to be the most economically feasible for small-scale power production

  • The internal combustion engine power system emitted more NO compared with other systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With increasing energy demands of the world and environmental awareness, biomass gasification is an alternative technology to solve those problems. This technology can significantly reduce the volume of biomass waste generated in developing societies [1]. Megwai and Richards [3] studied five power generation processes (gas turbines, steam turbines, micro gas turbines, Stirling engines, and internal combustion engines) in terms of electric performance, environmental indicators, and economic evaluations. The results showed that the internal combustion engine and the Stirling engine proved to be the most economically feasible for small-scale power production. The internal combustion engine power system emitted more NO compared with other systems. It was indicated that additional costs might be incurred for installing gas cleaning systems for treating the synthetic gas

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call