Abstract

Abstract. Climate change can cause significant modifications in hydrosedimentological processes. Climate projections indicate the occurrence of extreme events, in terms of precipitation, droughts, floods and temperature. By increasing temperatures and altering precipitation regimes, climate change is expected to affect sediment dynamics. Predictions of the effects of climate change on streamflow and sediment yield vary widely, depending on the geographical location and climate scenarios used. Mathematical modelling can be used to simulate the hydrosedimentological processes in watersheds and enable the simulation of climate change effects on sediment yield. This paper aims to simulate the impacts of climate change hydrosedimentological dynamics in the Apucaraninha River watershed (504 km²), southern Brazil, considering the climate change scenarios A2 (pessimistic about the emissions of greenhouse gases) and B2 (optimistic about the emissions of greenhouse gases), developed by the IPCC. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was used to evaluate the impacts of climate projections on the sediment yield in the Apucaraninha River watershed. The model was calibrated and validated using daily streamflow and sediment data from 1987 to 2012. The model presented satisfactory fit to the observed data allowing the reproduction of the current hydrological conditions of the watershed. Based on the satisfactory results in calibration and validation, the climate scenarios A2 and B2 were inserted to simulate streamflow and sediment conditions for the period 2071–2100. The results for both scenarios indicate that simulations of both climate scenarios resulted in changes in hydrosedimentological dynamics in the Apucaraninha River watershed, mainly in terms of decrease in average sediment yield due to the reduction in precipitation amount and increase in evapotranspiration. Our results also indicate that every 1% change in precipitation has resulted in 2.8% change in soil erosion and 1.6% change in runoff under scenario A2, and 2.3% change in erosion and 1.1% in runoff under scenarios B2, thus suggesting that climate change tends to affect sediment yield more than streamflow, although seasonally both could be impacted in similar ways.

Highlights

  • Climate variability may influence hydrosedimentological processes, given that the main climate variables such as precipitation, radiation and temperature, affect streamflow and sediment dynamics

  • Some Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) parameters were altered in order to adequately reproduce the actual hydrosedimentological conditions in Apucaraninha River watershed

  • This study shows that the SWAT model was able to reproduce the current hydrological conditions of the watershed enabling the simulation of climate scenarios to assess the impacts on the hydrological dynamics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate variability may influence hydrosedimentological processes, given that the main climate variables such as precipitation, radiation and temperature, affect streamflow and sediment dynamics. Changes in temperature could change evapotranspiration rates, affecting soil moisture and, infiltration and runoff (Pruski & Nearing, 2002). Langbein & Schumm (1958) reported that variations in temperature, intensity of precipitation events, number of storms and seasonal distribution of precipitation events may affect the sediment yield. Precipitation has strong impact on soil erosion. Changes in rainfall intensity and seasonality distribution play a significant role in future erosion rates under climate change (Nearing et al, 2004; Langbein & Schumm, 1958). Zhang & Nearing (2005) reported that an increase in precipitation variability was often accompanied by an increase in soil loss Changes in rainfall intensity and seasonality distribution play a significant role in future erosion rates under climate change (Nearing et al, 2004; Langbein & Schumm, 1958). Zhang & Nearing (2005) reported that an increase in precipitation variability was often accompanied by an increase in soil loss

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call