Abstract

PurposeFunctional inoperability in advanced oral cancer is difficult to assess preoperatively. To assess functions of lips and tongue, biomechanical models are required. Apart from adjusting generic models to individual anatomy, muscle activation patterns (MAPs) driving patient-specific functional movements are necessary to predict remaining functional outcome. We aim to evaluate how volunteer-specific MAPs derived from surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals control a biomechanical face model.MethodsMuscle activity of seven facial muscles in six volunteers was measured bilaterally with sEMG. A triple camera set-up recorded 3D lip movement. The generic face model in ArtiSynth was adapted to our needs. We controlled the model using the volunteer-specific MAPs. Three activation strategies were tested: activating all muscles (hbox {act}_mathrm{all}), selecting the three muscles showing highest muscle activity bilaterally (hbox {act}_3)—this was calculated by taking the mean of left and right muscles and then selecting the three with highest variance—and activating the muscles considered most relevant per instruction (hbox {act}_mathrm{rel}), bilaterally. The model’s lip movement was compared to the actual lip movement performed by the volunteers, using 3D correlation coefficients (rho ).ResultsThe correlation coefficient between simulations and measurements with hbox {act}_mathrm{rel} resulted in a median rho of 0.77. hbox {act}_3 had a median rho of 0.78, whereas with hbox {act}_mathrm{all} the median rho decreased to 0.45.ConclusionWe demonstrated that MAPs derived from noninvasive sEMG measurements can control movement of the lips in a generic finite element face model with a median rho of 0.78. Ultimately, this is important to show the patient-specific residual movement using the patient’s own MAPs. When the required treatment tools and personalisation techniques for geometry and anatomy become available, this may enable surgeons to test the functional results of wedge excisions for lip cancer in a virtual environment and to weigh surgery versus organ-sparing radiotherapy or photodynamic therapy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.