Abstract

Abstract When a reservoir is damaged, it will bring destruction to people's lives and the regional economy. Flood simulation and risk assessment are two effective ways to mitigate flood risk. Flood risk is assessed by using flood hazard and vulnerability indices. However, one of the key concerns is how to quantify hazards and vulnerabilities more rationally. To this end, this study introduces a new quantitative method for flood risk assessment. Three schemes – full dam breach (S1), 1/2 dam breach (S2), and 1/3 dam breach (S3) – were proposed for flood simulation. HEC-RAS 2D was used to simulate the evolution process of dam-break floods. This study used a new quantification approach to calculate flood risk based on simulation results. The results show the following: (1) The inundation process is similar under the three schemes, but the degree differs. The greater the degree of dam break, the greater the inundation depth, maximum flow velocity, and inundation duration. (2) High-risk areas decrease with decreased dam break degree. Under the three schemes, the flood risk areas of Longjing Street account for 65.37, 71.41, and 66.22% of the total risk areas, respectively, which are the areas most affected by dam-break floods.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call