Abstract
We have investigated by numerical simulation of real devices the reasons for electron injection enhancement due to lithium fluoride (LiF) and for hole injection enhancement due to copper phtalocyanine (CuPc) in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). The reference data introduced in the code were obtained from Kelvin probe and charge transport measurements. In the case of LiF, the reduction of the injection barrier is mainly due to a static dipolar charge distribution across the ionic layer, while in CuPc the space charge which lowers the barrier results from a large hole accumulation at the CuPc/hole-transmitting layer interface, during injection.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
