Abstract

High-speed planing crafts have successfully evolved through developments in the last several decades. Classical approaches such as inviscid potential flow–based methods and the empirically based Savitsky method provide general understanding for practical design. However, sometimes such analyses suffer inaccuracies since the air–water interface effects, especially in the transition phase, are not fully accounted for. Hence, understanding the behaviour at the transition speed is of fundamental importance for the designer. The fluid forces in planing hulls are dominated by phenomena such as flow separation at various discontinuities viz., knuckles, chines and transom, with resultant spray generation. In such cases, the application of potential theory at high speeds introduces limitations. This paper investigates the simulation of modelling of the pre-planing behaviour with a view to capturing the air–water interface effects, with validations through experiments to compare the drag, dynamic trim and wetted surface area. The paper also brings out the merits of gridding strategies to obtain reliable results especially with regard to spray generation due to the air–water interface effects. The verification and validation studies serve to authenticate the use of the multi-gridding strategies on the basis of comparisons with simulations using model tests. It emerges from the study that overset/chimera grids give better results compared with single unstructured hexahedral grids. Two overset methods are investigated to obtain reliable estimation of the dynamic trim and drag, and their ability to capture the spray resulting from the air–water interaction. The results demonstrate very close simulation of the actual flow kinematics at steady-speed conditions in terms of spray at the air–water interface, drag at the pre-planing and full planing range and dynamic trim angles.

Highlights

  • Planing hull forms in principle attain dynamic lift beyond a threshold speed

  • This paper presents the methodology of successful modelling of the pre-planing behaviour with faithful representation of the air–water interface effects

  • The formation and breakup of the turbulent fluid flow layer associated with the generation of bow spray is obviously a complex multiphase flow problem

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Planing hull forms in principle attain dynamic lift beyond a threshold speed. The same light hull which performs well at the pre-planing transition speed may exhibit heavy spray when operating at a heavier load, and the heavy spray may get subdued at the designed full planing speed. The generated bow and stern waves are normally steep and may break. Due to these complex flow patterns generated by planing hulls and the added difficulties to model and compute the highly geometrically non-linear free surfaces, potential flow methods are not preferred to model these phenomena. The running mean of oscillations is less than 0.84% of the mean value for all response variables across the cases. For SG mesh, the variation of response variables is about 2%, and it is more sensitive to the variation of inner iterations.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call