Abstract

Excess nutrient inputs and climate change are two of multiple stressors affecting many lakes worldwide. Lake Vansjø in southern Norway is one such eutrophic lake impacted by blooms of toxic blue-green algae (cyanobacteria), and classified as moderate ecological status under the EU Water Framework Directive. Future climate change may exacerbate the situation. Here we use a set of chained models (global climate model, hydrological model, catchment phosphorus (P) model, lake model, Bayesian Network) to assess the possible future ecological status of the lake, given the set of climate scenarios and storylines common to the EU project MARS (Managing Aquatic Ecosystems and Water Resources under Multiple Stress). The model simulations indicate that climate change alone will increase precipitation and runoff, and give higher P fluxes to the lake, but cause little increase in phytoplankton biomass or changes in ecological status. For the storylines of future management and land-use, however, the model results indicate that both the phytoplankton biomass and the lake ecological status can be positively or negatively affected. Our results also show the value in predicting a biological indicator of lake ecological status, in this case, cyanobacteria biomass with a BN model. For all scenarios, cyanobacteria contribute to worsening the status assessed by phytoplankton, compared to using chlorophyll-a alone.

Highlights

  • The PERSIST and INCA-P models were manually calibrated against Q and total phosphorus (TP) loads, respectively, for the time-period 1/1/1983–31/12/2014

  • The Bayesian Network was used to project the changes in the ecological status of Lake Vansjø, given the alternative future climate scenarios and storylines (Fig. 10)

  • A Bayesian network (BN) is an essential end point in the model chain as it provides the necessary quantitative tools to link the projections of Chl provided by MyLake to estimates of the probability of cyanobacteria abundance that exceed the threshold for good ecological status

Read more

Summary

Introduction

55% of European waterbodies failed to meet the objective of good ecological status mandated by the Water Framework Directive (WFD) (EU, 2000), with nutrient pollution being one of the most significant causes. Eutrophic lakes may have blooms of toxic blue-green algae (cyanobacteria), fish kills, unpalatable drinking water, and unaesthetic bathing water (Carvalho et al, 2013). Climate change may exacerbate these problems (Chapra et al, 2017), for example, by increasing water temperatures or by increasing precipitation, impacting nutrient loads from the catchment. Mitigation measures undertaken to fulfil the WFD may be offset by the effects of climate change. Climate change may ameliorate eutrophication by diluting nutrient concentrations through increased precipitation and discharge. Eutrophic lakes face multiple stressors, and the combined effects can be synergistic or antagonistic (Hering et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call