Abstract

Accurate estimation of the leaf area index (LAI) is essential for crop growth simulations and agricultural management. This study conducted a field experiment with rice and measured the LAI in different rice growth periods. The multispectral bands (B) including red edge (RE, 730 nm ± 16 nm), near-infrared (NIR, 840 nm ± 26 nm), green (560 nm ± 16 nm), red (650 nm ± 16 nm), blue (450 nm ± 16 nm), and visible light (RGB) were also obtained by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with multispectral sensors (DJI-P4M, SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.). Based on the bands, five vegetation indexes (VI) including Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (GNDVI), Leaf Chlorophyll Index (LCI), Normalized Difference Red Edge Index (NDRE), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Optimization Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (OSAVI) were calculated. The semi-empirical model (SEM), the random forest model (RF), and the Extreme Gradient Boosting model (XGBoost) were used to estimate rice LAI based on multispectral bands, VIs, and their combinations, respectively. The results indicated that the GNDVI had the highest accuracy in the SEM (R2 = 0.78, RMSE = 0.77). For the single band, NIR had the highest accuracy in both RF (R2 = 0.73, RMSE = 0.98) and XGBoost (R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 0.88). Band combination of NIR + red improved the estimation accuracy in both RF (R2 = 0.87, RMSE = 0.65) and XGBoost (R2 = 0.88, RMSE = 0.63). NDRE and LCI were the first two single VIs for LAI estimation using both RF and XGBoost. However, putting more than one VI together could only increase the LAI estimation accuracy slightly. Meanwhile, the bands + VIs combinations could improve the accuracy in both RF and XGBoost. Our study recommended estimating rice LAI by a combination of red + NIR + OSAVI + NDVI + GNDVI + LCI + NDRE (2B + 5V) with XGBoost to obtain high accuracy and overcome the potential over-fitting issue (R2 = 0.91, RMSE = 0.54).

Highlights

  • Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.Leaf area index (LAI) was first introduced by Watson [1] and defined as the sum of the leaf area per unit ground area

  • The scatterplots between vegetation indexes (VI) and leaf area index (LAI) of the SEM in the test process are shown in Figure 5 with the parameters (KVI and VI∞ ) in Table 1

  • Previous studies indicated that the Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (GNDVI) was more stable than Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) by replacing the red band with the green band of NDVI and had higher LAI prediction accuracy than NDVI [54,55]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Leaf area index (LAI) was first introduced by Watson [1] and defined as the sum of the leaf area per unit ground area. LAI is commonly used as an important structural and biophysical indicator of vegetation for crop photosynthesis [2], productivity [3], and water utilization [4]. LAI is often required as an input parameter in many models for crop growth diagnosis, biomass estimation, and yield prediction in the application of precision agriculture [5,6,7]. The observations of LAI include direct and indirect measurement.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call