Abstract

A daylighting control system that uses the closed loop proportional algorithm needs to be calibrated both during nighttime and daytime. The selection of the daytime calibration time can affect the behavior of the system and is usually performed when the ratio of the illuminance of the ceiling sensor (SD,tc) to the illuminance at a point on the working plane (ED,tc) is relatively large without sunlight patches in the ceiling photo-sensor’s field of view (FOV). However, this requirement is not associated with a specific value and can be achieved under a wide range of conditions related to the sky luminance distribution. In the present work, four ceiling sensors with different field of views (FOVs) were examined in a typical north-facing office space. The effect of daytime calibration on the system’s performance was estimated through the calculation of lighting energy savings and the overdimming percentage. The results show that the effect of both the FOV of the ceiling sensor and the daytime calibration period is small except for the case of the sensor without cover, especially when it is close to the opening. In an attempt to quantify the SDtc/IDtc ratio, a new magnitude (RR) is proposed by dividing the illuminance ratios of the ceiling photo-sensor by that on the working surface during daytime and nighttime calibration. Thus, the daily calibration of the sensors with cover can be performed when RR > 1.

Highlights

  • Lighting has a significant impact on the energy balance of commercial buildings

  • The proper selection of the day-time calibration is crucial for the performance of the control system

  • The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of daytime calibration on the performance of a closed loop proportional DLC system using simulations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lighting has a significant impact on the energy balance of commercial buildings. In the USA, in these buildings, lighting accounts for 17% of the total electricity consumption [1]making it one of the largest electricity end users. Installed power can be reduced due to a combination of improved technology (higher energy efficiency) and design practices (e.g., localized together with general lighting) while the reduction of the operating time can be realized by both personal awareness and the adoption of automation. Automation systems such as those based on the use of sensors (occupancy, illumination or luminance) or switches that operate with time scheduling can greatly increase lighting energy savings [3,4]. Without its acceptance from the users, energy savings can be minimized or even negligible [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call