Abstract
The current work discusses the Human Diachronic Simulation Paradigm (HUDSPA), a method to experimentally probe into historical meaning change set up to (i) scan for configurations similar to attested alterations of meaning but in (typically, but not necessarily, related) languages or varieties which did not actualize the change(s) under investigations; (ii) measure the reactions of native speakers in order to ascertain the verisimilitude as well as the particular semantic and pragmatic properties of the items scrutinized. Specifically, the present paper discusses the relative propensity of a particularizer (German eben) to be interpreted with comparatively high confidence as a scalar additive particle such as even and of a concessive item like English though to be interpreted similar to a modal particle along the lines of German doch.
Highlights
Diachronic and fieldwork semantics both model natural language variation
Deal (2020) considers variable-force modals in synchronic and diachronic semantics and raises questions about diachronic conclusions
Diachronic semantics is constrained in multiple respects and to some serious extent this appears to be due to its intrinsic nature, which seems to run counter to methods of inquiry used in, say, modern cross-linguistic semantics. regardless of the origins of possible empirical dissonances and difficulties in diachronic semantics, a continuous refinement of the empirical methods that are used in this branch seems to us to be imperative and useful
Summary
Diachronic and fieldwork semantics both model natural language variation. Their standard methods of empirical verification vary considerably. Sometimes, they are even viewed as not (yet) fully compatible. Deal (2020) considers variable-force modals in synchronic and diachronic semantics and raises questions about diachronic conclusions (e.g. when variable-force semantics is suggested based on a sample of 72 Old English examples). Our present goal is not to engage with particulars of Old English modality (cf Cournane 2017, Gergel 2016, 2017, Yanovich 2006, Solt & Umbach 2019 for broader discussions of natural-language modality from different perspectives with relevance to historical studies). Diachronic semantics is constrained in multiple respects and to some serious extent this appears to be due to its intrinsic nature, which seems to run counter to methods of inquiry used in, say, modern cross-linguistic semantics. (we do not think that such a putative incompatibility is a necessary conclusion, as we will see.) regardless of the origins of possible empirical dissonances and difficulties in diachronic semantics, a continuous refinement of the empirical methods that are used in this branch seems to us to be imperative and useful.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
