Abstract

Use of virtual proxies of live animals are rapidly gaining ground in studies of animal behaviour. Such proxies help to reduce the number of live experimental animals needed to stimulate the behaviour of experimental individuals and to increase standardisation. However, using too simplistic proxies may fail to induce a desired effect and/or lead to quick habituation. For instance, in a predation context, prey often employ multimodal cues to detect predators or use specific aspects of predator behaviour to assess threat. In a live interaction, predator and prey often show behaviours directed towards each other, which are absent in virtual proxies. Here we compared the effectiveness of chemical and visual predator cues in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher, a species in which predation pressure has been the evolutionary driver of its sociality. We created playbacks of predators simulating an attack and tested their effectiveness in comparison to a playback showing regular activity and to a live predator. We further compared the effectiveness of predator odour and conspecific skin extracts on behaviours directed towards a predator playback. Regular playbacks of calmly swimming predators were less effective than live predators in stimulating a focal individual’s aggression and attention. However, playbacks mimicking an attacking predator induced responses much like a live predator. Chemical cues did not affect predator directed behaviour.

Highlights

  • Predation risk is thought to play an important role in determining life-history trajectories, the social system and behaviours among animals (Holling, 1965; Tollrian, 1995; Stearns, 2000; Heg et al, 2004; Preisser & Bolnick, 2008; Walsh & Reznick, 2008; Groenewoud et al, 2016; Fischer et al, 2017a)

  • The number of aggressive displays towards the stimulus was determined by the type of presentation (GLMM, χ 2 = 23.41, p = 0.0001; Fig. 2A)

  • We administered chemical cues in combination with visual cues and our results suggest that N. pulcher ignore cues from predator odour or conspecific skin extract in the presence of visual cues

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predation risk is thought to play an important role in determining life-history trajectories, the social system and behaviours among animals (Holling, 1965; Tollrian, 1995; Stearns, 2000; Heg et al, 2004; Preisser & Bolnick, 2008; Walsh & Reznick, 2008; Groenewoud et al, 2016; Fischer et al, 2017a). An alternative approach is to use ‘virtual proxies’ on captive prey, which reduces the ethical implications of subjecting such prey to live predators and removes the logistical and ethical issues of manipulating predators. Many proxies such as decoys (Arroyo, Mougeot & Bretagnolle, 2001; Li et al, 2014; Catano et al, 2016; Griesser & Suzuki, 2017; Morales, Lucas & Velando, 2018), screen presentations

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call