Abstract

This study assesses the impact of the lightning nitric oxide (LNO) production schemes in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model on ground-level air quality as well as aloft atmospheric chemistry through detailed evaluation of model predictions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and ozone (O3) with corresponding observations for the US. For ground-level evaluations, hourly O3 and NOx values from the U.S. EPA Air Quality System (AQS) monitoring network are used to assess the impact of different LNO schemes on model prediction of these species in time and space. Vertical evaluations are performed using ozonesonde and P-3B aircraft measurements during the Deriving Information on Surface Conditions from Column and Vertically Resolved Observations Relevant to Air Quality (DISCOVER-AQ) campaign conducted in the Baltimore– Washington region during July 2011. The impact on wet deposition of nitrate is assessed using measurements from the National Atmospheric Deposition Program’s National Trends Network (NADP NTN). Compared with the Base model (without LNO), the impact of LNO on surface O3 varies from region to region depending on the Base model conditions. Overall statistics suggest that for regions where surface O3 mixing ratios are already overestimated, the incorporation of additional NO from lightning generally increased model overestimation of mean daily maximum 8 h (DM8HR) O3 by 1–2 ppb. In regions where surface O3 is underestimated by the Base model, LNO can significantly reduce the underestimation and bring model predictions close to observations. Analysis of vertical profiles reveals that LNO can significantly improve the vertical structure of modeled O3 distributions by reducing underestimation aloft and to a lesser degree decreasing overestimation near the surface. Since the Base model underestimates the wet deposition of nitrate in most regions across the modeling domain with the exception of the Pacific Coast, the inclusion of LNO leads to reduction in biases and errors and an increase in correlation coefficients at almost all the NADP NTN sites. Among the three LNO schemes described in Kang et al. (2019), the hNLDN scheme, which is implemented using hourly observed lightning flash data from National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN), performs best for comparisons with ground-level values, vertical profiles, and wet deposition of nitrate; the mNLDN scheme (the monthly NLDN-based scheme) performed slightly better. However, when observed lightning flash data are not available, the linear regression-based parameterization scheme, pNLDN, provides an improved estimate for nitrate wet deposition compared to the base simulation that does not include LNO.

Highlights

  • In Kang et al (2019), we described the existing lightning nitric oxide (LNO) parameterization scheme that is based on the monthly National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) lightning flash data and an updated scheme using hourly NLDN lightning flash data in the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) lightning module

  • There are four CMAQ simulation scenarios for this study: (1) simulation without LNO (Base), (2) simulation with LNO generated by the scheme based on monthly information from the NLDN, (3) simulation with LNO generated by scheme based on hourly information from the NLDN, and (4) simulation with LNO generated by the scheme parameterizing lightning emissions based on modeled convective activity as described in detail in Kang et al (2019)

  • A detailed evaluation of lightning nitrogen oxides (NOx) emission estimation parameterizations available in the CMAQ modeling system was performed through comparisons of model simulation results with surface and aloft air quality measurements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the availability of lightning flash data from the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) (Orville et al, 2002), recent LNO parameterization schemes have started to include the observed lightning flash information to constrain LNO in regional chemical transport models (CTMs) (Allen et al, 2012). The first study on the impact of LNO on surface air quality using CMAQ was conducted by Allen et al (2012) and was followed by Wang et al (2013) with different ways for parameterizing LNO production and different model configurations. We present performance evaluations using each of the LNO production schemes (mNLDN, hNLDN, and pNLDN) described by Kang et al (2019) to provide estimates of LNO in CMAQ.

The LNO schemes
The CMAQ model and simulation configurations
Observations and analysis techniques
Statistical performance metrics
Time series
Diurnal variations
Spatial variations
Ozone-sonde observations
P-3B measurement
Deposition evaluation for nitrate
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.