Simulated resections and RNS placement can optimize post-operative seizure outcomes when guided by fast ripple networks.

Abstract

In medication-resistant epilepsy, the goal of epilepsy surgery is to make a patient seizure free with a resection/ablation that is as small as possible to minimize morbidity. The standard of care in planning the margins of epilepsy surgery involves electroclinical delineation of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) and incorporation of neuroimaging findings from MRI, PET, SPECT, and MEG modalities. Resecting cortical tissue generating high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) has been investigated as a more efficacious alternative to targeting the SOZ. In this study, we used a support vector machine (SVM), with four distinct fast ripple (FR: 350-600 Hz on oscillations, 200-600 Hz on spikes) metrics as factors. These metrics included the FR resection ratio (RR), a spatial FR network measure, and two temporal FR network measures. The SVM was trained by the value of these four factors with respect to the actual resection boundaries and actual seizure free labels of 18 patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy. Leave one out cross-validation of the trained SVM in this training set had an accuracy of 0.78. We next used a simulated iterative virtual resection targeting the FR sites that were highest rate and showed most temporal autonomy. The trained SVM utilized the four virtual FR metrics to predict virtual seizure freedom. In all but one of the nine patients seizure free after surgery, we found that the virtual resections sufficient for virtual seizure freedom were larger in volume (p<0.05). In nine patients who were not seizure free, a larger virtual resection made five virtually seizure free. We also examined 10 medically refractory focal epilepsy patients implanted with the responsive neurostimulator system (RNS) and virtually targeted the RNS stimulation contacts proximal to sites generating FR at highest rates to determine if the simulated value of the stimulated SOZ and stimulated FR metrics would trend toward those patients with a better seizure outcome. Our results suggest: 1) FR measures can accurately predict whether a resection, defined by the standard of care, will result in seizure freedom; 2) utilizing FR alone for planning an efficacious surgery can be associated with larger resections; 3) when FR metrics predict the standard of care resection will fail, amending the boundaries of the planned resection with certain FR generating sites may improve outcome; and 4) more work is required to determine if targeting RNS stimulation contact proximal to FR generating sites will improve seizure outcome.