Simulated Reduced-Count Whole-Body FDG PET: Evaluation in Children and Young Adults Imaged on a Digital PET Scanner.

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Digital PET scanners with increased sensitivity may allow shorter scan acquisition times or reductions in administered radiopharmaceutical activities. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in children and young adults the impact of shorter simulated acquisition times on the quality of whole-body FDG PET images obtained using a digital PET/CT system. METHODS. This retrospective study included 27 children and young adults (nine male and 18 female patients) who underwent clinically indicated whole-body FDG PET/CT examinations performed using a 25-cm axial FOV PET/CT system at 90 s per bed position (expressed hereafter as seconds per bed). Raw list-mode data were reprocessed to simulate acquisition times of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, and 30 s/bed. Three radiologists independently reviewed reconstructed images and assigned Likert scores for lesion conspicuity, normal structure conspicuity, image quality, and image noise. A separate observer recorded the SUVmax, SUVmean, and SD of the SUV (SUVSD) for liver, thigh, and the most FDG-avid lesion. The SUVSD/SUVmean (the SUVSD divided by the SUVmean) was calculated as a surrogate of image noise. ANOVA, the Friedman test, and the Dunn test were used to compare qualitative measures (combining reader scores) and SUV measurements. RESULTS. The mean patient age was 10.8 ± 8.3 (SD) years, mean BMI was 18.7 ± 2.9, and mean administered FDG activity was 4.44 ± 0.37 MBq/kg (0.12 ± 0.01 mCi/kg). No qualitative measure showed a significant difference versus 90 s/bed for the simulated acquisition at 60 s/bed (all p > .05). Significant differences (all p < .05) versus 90 s/bed were observed for lesion conspicuity at at most 40 s/bed, conspicuity of normal structures and overall image quality at at most 45 s/bed, and image noise at at most 55 s/bed. SUVmean was not significantly different from 90 s/bed for any site for any reduced-count simulation (all p > .05). SUVSD/SUVmean and SUVmax showed gradual increases with decreasing acquisition times and were significantly different from 90 s/bed only for liver at 60 s/bed (for SUVmax: 1.00 ± 0.00 vs 1.05 ± 0.03, p = .02; for SUVSD/SUVmean: 0.09 ± 0.02 vs 0.11 ± 0.02, p = .04). CONCLUSION. Favorable findings for the simulated acquisition at 60 s/bed suggest that, in children and young adults who undergo imaging performed using a 25-cm FOV digital PET scanner, acquisition time or administered FDG activity may be decreased by approximately 33% from the clinical standard without significantly impacting image quality. CLINICAL IMPACT. A 25-cm axial FOV digital scanner may allow FDG PET/CT examinations to be performed with reduced radiation exposure or faster scan acquisition times.