Abstract
Water markets have the potential to greatly improve the productive use of water by reallocating entitlements to where they are most highly valued. However, water markets do not always function efficiently because the property rights structure initially was not designed for market transactions. A major challenge dominating Australia's water reform agenda is to rationalise the complex and inconsistent water entitlements within and across jurisdictions to facilitate markets. In this paper, a classification framework was developed to identify entitlement types and specify entitlement attributes, and alternative entitlements arrangement options are proposed to minimise transaction costs and streamline administrative processes. Although the study focuses on the reform of water entitlements systems in the Australian context, its broad implications are briefly discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.