Abstract
A common procedure used for the seismic assessment of complex bridges is a three-dimensional linear-response spectrum analysis. The linear nature of such an analysis can lead to erroneous results and misdiagnosis of vulnerable components. Analysis that accounts for the nonlinear behavior of components is desirable, but the human resource effort required to properly model an entire bridge is usually more than what most owners would like to invest. The use of simplified nonlinear modeling as a complement to larger linear models is discussed, providing the engineer with a true sense of structure response during the seismic event. The result is a proper diagnosis of vulnerabilities without a large analytical design effort. Three bridge case studies illustrate examples of nonlinear assessment of retaining walls, reinforced concrete connections, steel members, and viscous damping devices.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.