Abstract
Since minimally invasive approach for fecal diversion in low-velocity extraperitoneal rectal injuries (EPRI) has a lower morbidity than open, and since computed tomography (CT) scan is helpful in ruling out concomitant intraperitoneal injuries (IPI), we utilized both modalities to simplify management of such injuries. Retrospective review of stable patients with EPRI, treated with laparoscopic assisted diversion, after a CT scan, compared with patients with similar injuries that had a negative laparotomy and a colostomy. The laparoscopy group had a shorter length of stay (3 +/- 2 days versus 7 +/- 2 days), earlier return of bowel function (3 +/- 2 days versus 5 +/- 2 days) and fewer infectious complications. If the CT scan was negative for IPI, none were found on open exploration or laparoscopy. If IPI are ruled out with a preoperative CT scan, laparoscopy-assisted colostomy is safe and less morbid.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
